<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nvidia&#8217;s back is against the wall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:28:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaiulBaztepo</title>
		<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RaiulBaztepo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmikemagee.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-2031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello!
Very Interesting post! Thank you for such interesting resource! 
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I&#039;v just started to learn this language ;)
See you! 
Your, Raiul Baztepo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!<br />
Very Interesting post! Thank you for such interesting resource!<br />
PS: Sorry for my bad english, I&#8217;v just started to learn this language ;)<br />
See you!<br />
Your, Raiul Baztepo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerücht: AMD hat was im Ärmel - The Inquirer DE</title>
		<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerücht: AMD hat was im Ärmel - The Inquirer DE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmikemagee.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-1566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] MadMikeMageek‘s Blog  // [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MadMikeMageek‘s Blog  // [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koenigtiger</title>
		<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[koenigtiger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmikemagee.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s possibile  but not likely that AMD/ATI can pull something like that ,   I think they will aim at the price/performance ratio in the mid-range like   HD3000 ,  but that&#039;s where the most of the market is . in the mid-range,  of course they can make a lot of money with high-end but i don&#039;t think AMD/ATI has done enough research and development to sustain a hing-end market with the financial dificulties they are facing , so they will have to satisfy with mid-range and concentrate on price/performance ratio .
Good luck AMD/ATI  , you&#039;ll need it !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s possibile  but not likely that AMD/ATI can pull something like that ,   I think they will aim at the price/performance ratio in the mid-range like   HD3000 ,  but that&#8217;s where the most of the market is . in the mid-range,  of course they can make a lot of money with high-end but i don&#8217;t think AMD/ATI has done enough research and development to sustain a hing-end market with the financial dificulties they are facing , so they will have to satisfy with mid-range and concentrate on price/performance ratio .<br />
Good luck AMD/ATI  , you&#8217;ll need it !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmikemagee.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So - you bothered to check back,  slackboy? You wanted to get a reaction and couldn&#039;t resist responding when you did. 

Sad, really...

Come back when you&#039;re out of nappies, and maybe we can have an adult conversation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8211; you bothered to check back,  slackboy? You wanted to get a reaction and couldn&#8217;t resist responding when you did. </p>
<p>Sad, really&#8230;</p>
<p>Come back when you&#8217;re out of nappies, and maybe we can have an adult conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slackwareboy</title>
		<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slackwareboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmikemagee.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[--
Sort ‘em out Mike
--
YES!  HE HAS BEEN WRONNNNNGED!

---
especially that snotty-nosed little whippersnapper ‘Slackwareboy’. 
---
Sorry.

---
How someone who’s clearly only just prised himself away from his mother’s tit has the ‘right’ to criticise someone on his own bog who’s worked in the industry for over 30 years is beyond me.
---
If he has 30 years experience he picked the wrong line of work.

---
Personally, I’d just delete all his posts. Because you can…
---
Oh boo hoo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211;<br />
Sort ‘em out Mike<br />
&#8211;<br />
YES!  HE HAS BEEN WRONNNNNGED!</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
especially that snotty-nosed little whippersnapper ‘Slackwareboy’.<br />
&#8212;<br />
Sorry.</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
How someone who’s clearly only just prised himself away from his mother’s tit has the ‘right’ to criticise someone on his own bog who’s worked in the industry for over 30 years is beyond me.<br />
&#8212;<br />
If he has 30 years experience he picked the wrong line of work.</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
Personally, I’d just delete all his posts. Because you can…<br />
&#8212;<br />
Oh boo hoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ehem</title>
		<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ehem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmikemagee.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my guest 
1a dual chip mid range/low end gpu&#039;s
2. r700 will arrive
3 . tri/quadmulti  chip being develop
4. native dual/tri/quad gpu chip]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my guest<br />
1a dual chip mid range/low end gpu&#8217;s<br />
2. r700 will arrive<br />
3 . tri/quadmulti  chip being develop<br />
4. native dual/tri/quad gpu chip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael LaBossiere</title>
		<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael LaBossiere]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmikemagee.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t say their back is against the wall. I&#039;d say there are rumors of such a wall that might exist someday. :)

But, it is (was) good to have AMD pushing Intel. It will be good if AMD can push NVIDIA. When companies have real competition, that tends to yield better and cheaper products for us. 

I have an ATI card in my Mac and an NVIDIA card in my PC (AMD processor). I like both brands, but have found NVIDIA to be a bit better (a bit more card for the money). But I did like my ATI All-in-Wonder a lot. Both companies make some good stuff. 

In any case, I hope AMD scores a success. I&#039;d hate to see them weaken to the point that Intel can ignore them. 

http://aphilosopher.wordpress.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say their back is against the wall. I&#8217;d say there are rumors of such a wall that might exist someday. :)</p>
<p>But, it is (was) good to have AMD pushing Intel. It will be good if AMD can push NVIDIA. When companies have real competition, that tends to yield better and cheaper products for us. </p>
<p>I have an ATI card in my Mac and an NVIDIA card in my PC (AMD processor). I like both brands, but have found NVIDIA to be a bit better (a bit more card for the money). But I did like my ATI All-in-Wonder a lot. Both companies make some good stuff. </p>
<p>In any case, I hope AMD scores a success. I&#8217;d hate to see them weaken to the point that Intel can ignore them. </p>
<p><a href="http://aphilosopher.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://aphilosopher.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynewulf</title>
		<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynewulf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmikemagee.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#039;Slackwareboy&#039; does have a certain whiff of NVidia fanboyism about him. I can almost picture his website without even going there.

Now here&#039;s some pointless speculation for you... 

Wasn&#039;t Thunder the previous name of an AMD dual-socket motherboard? Could this be something to do with multiple GPU cores perhaps?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Slackwareboy&#8217; does have a certain whiff of NVidia fanboyism about him. I can almost picture his website without even going there.</p>
<p>Now here&#8217;s some pointless speculation for you&#8230; </p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t Thunder the previous name of an AMD dual-socket motherboard? Could this be something to do with multiple GPU cores perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [NH] AMD Thunder to squander NVIDIA's market dominance? - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net</title>
		<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[[NH] AMD Thunder to squander NVIDIA's market dominance? - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmikemagee.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] code name Thunder has been uttered by old mad Mike Magee over at his personal blog. Thunder&lt;/U&gt; is the name of a new strategy and not a card per se, and could very well be the upcoming R700 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] code name Thunder has been uttered by old mad Mike Magee over at his personal blog. Thunder&lt;/U&gt; is the name of a new strategy and not a card per se, and could very well be the upcoming R700 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://volesoft.com/2008/03/13/nvidias-back-is-against-the-wall/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madmikemagee.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sort &#039;em out Mike; especially that snotty-nosed little whippersnapper &#039;Slackwareboy&#039;.  How someone who&#039;s clearly only just prised himself away from his mother&#039;s tit has the &#039;right&#039; to criticise someone on his own bog who&#039;s worked in the industry for over 30 years is beyond me.

Personally, I&#039;d just delete all his posts. Because you can...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sort &#8216;em out Mike; especially that snotty-nosed little whippersnapper &#8216;Slackwareboy&#8217;.  How someone who&#8217;s clearly only just prised himself away from his mother&#8217;s tit has the &#8216;right&#8217; to criticise someone on his own bog who&#8217;s worked in the industry for over 30 years is beyond me.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d just delete all his posts. Because you can&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

